Contentsquare vs. Acoustic: which is best for experience analytics?

Tealeaf (also known as Tealeaf by Acoustic or Acoustic Experience Analytics) helped pioneer experience analytics way back in 1999. Today, it’s one of the few platforms that still offers on-premises deployment. 

But as a cloud solution, it requires heavy setup, is difficult for non-analyst teams to use, and lacks the connected insights needed to see which issues matter most.

Contentsquare (hello! 👋) launched more than a decade later, but we’re now trusted by twice as many enterprise customers as Acoustic, driving  better experiences for over 1.3 million websites and apps.

Keep reading to find out exactly how Contentsquare and Tealeaf compare, which companies Acoustic might be right for, and why we’re confident that Contentsquare is the best choice for any company that wants to turn customer behavior into business growth.

Key takeaways

• Contentsquare is the market leading experience analytics platform, trusted by +3,700 enterprise brands and +1.3 million websites and apps worldwide

• Tealeaf, or Acoustic Experience Analytics, is a legacy tool focused on session replay that can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud, but is primarily built for use by analysts

• Tealeaf requires manual tagging, offers limited automation, lacks retroactive analysis and built-in revenue impact scoring, and is split across multiple products, slowing adoption for non-technical teams

• Contentsquare combines behavior analytics, performance monitoring, and customer feedback in one AI-powered platform that automatically captures every interaction and connects insights to business impact

• Choose Contentsquare to enable every team to self-serve insights across the entire digital experience and make faster decisions based on business impact, not guesswork

• Choose Tealeaf if you need on-premises deployment and have the IT resources to manage a complex setup

Contentsquare and Acoustic Experience Analytics compared

Feature lists aren’t really going to help you understand what you can achieve with Contentsquare or Acoustic. After all, you’re not actually looking for the best session replay tool; you need to know why users behave the way they do and what it means for your business.

Use the below table to see how Tealeaf and Contentsquare compare in terms of how they can be used to overcome your biggest use cases and challenges. 

What are the main differences between Acoustic and Contentsquare?

Tealeaf has been around for decades, but it hasn’t kept up with how modern digital teams work. It’s still built around manual setup, complicated workflows, and fragmented tools that add barriers and slow down decisions.

In contrast, Contentsquare gives teams a complete, AI-powered experience analytics platform that’s fast to implement, simple to use across roles, and designed to connect every insight to business impact.

Here are the 8 differences that matter between Contentsquare and Acoustic:

1. Fragmented insights vs. all-in-one platform

Acoustic isn’t a single analytics solution, it’s a group of disconnected tools. There’s Tealeaf for experience analytics, Acoustic Campaign for marketing, Acoustic Connect for customer engagement—and the list goes on.

Even if your entire organization adopted Acoustic, your teams would still be jumping between interfaces, syncing data manually, and dealing with inconsistent reporting.

Acoustic Experience Analytics aka Tealeaf aka Tealeaf by Acoustic—are you confused yet?

By contrast, Contentsquare is an all--in one experience intelligence platform that brings together Experience Analytics, Experience Monitoring, Voice of Customer, and Product Analytics in one place. 

Every team works from a single shared source or truth, switching between tools without losing context or needing to jump between platforms to get the full picture.

Every insight is connected, actionable, and built to support fast decisions across teams. Noticed a drop in conversions on a product page? Trigger a targeted survey to understand why. Spotted an error that’s spiking exit rates? Quantify the revenue impact and share a replay with the dev team. 

Contentsquare combines behavior, feedback, performance, and product analytics in one, AI-powered, easy-to-use platform

And if you want to enrich insights with data from other tools, Data Connect lets you automatically export structured experience data to your warehouse or BI layer.

2. Complex setup vs. autocapture

Tealeaf requires heavy upfront setup. You need to define every event in advance, add custom tags across your site or app, and keep them updated as the experience evolves. This creates constant developer overhead. And if something wasn’t tagged, there’s no way to recover the insight. Contentsquare automatically captures every event and interaction across your website and app (we call it Smart Capture). You can explore any behavior retroactively, segment by any dimension, and answer new questions as they come up without relying on developers to reconfigure tracking.

“Smart Capture is a key feature for us. It saves us considerable time, eliminates tracking error, and allows us to focus on analyzing the data rather than setting up the tracking.” - Sarah Lacroix, Global Head of Product Design at Criteo

3. On-premises vs. cloud/SaaS

One of the main benefits of Tealeaf is that it can be implemented on-premises or as a SaaS solution. If your company has strict hosting or data residency requirements, on-premises deployment may meet your control and compliance needs, but it comes with greater setup and maintenance demands.

Contentsquare is cloud-only, which means faster setup, automatic updates, and no maintenance overhead, while still ensuring your organization meets the highest standards for security, compliance, and privacy.

4. Limited adoption vs. cross-team usability

Even if you have the resources to get Tealeaf up and running, most of your teams won’t use it. 

Acoustic was built for analysts, not product, marketing, or UX teams. The interface is complex and makes it difficult for most users to self-serve the data they need.

No more digging for data: Chat with Sense in Contentsquare to get instant, contextual answers you can act on

Contentsquare is built for every team. We give you visual tools (like our sunburst journey maps) to make exploration intuitive. Sense, our platform’s AI, automatically surfaces what matters most, and conversational AI lets you convert plain-language prompts  (such as “Where do my users drop off?”) into answers without relying on analysts or waiting for reports.

“Chat with Sense enables team members without analytics expertise to perform behavioural data analysis. Anybody can ask Sense a question, you don’t have to be an expert. And it’s so fast: it gets us the insights we need in seconds.” - Francesca Ceron, Digital User Experience Lead at IDM Südtirol

5. Dated tech vs. continuous innovation

Tealeaf was once pioneering, but it hasn’t kept up with the times. It relies heavily on manual analysis, offers little to no intelligent automation, and provides limited guidance to help you prioritize what matters.

And there’s little indication the product is evolving. At the time of writing, Acoustic hadn’t posted a Tealeaf release update in almost a year. 

And then there’s Contentsquare.

Contentsquare is the market leader. We're trusted by +3,700 enterprise brands and +1.3 million websites and apps. If you choose us, your goals will be supported by a team of +1,800 across 16 global offices, and backed by +$1.4 billion in funding—all focused on building the future of experience analytics. 

Take a look at our release updates page to see the value we add every single month.

Just a handful of the Contentsquare team celebrating a product launch in Times Square 🎉

6. Manual analysis vs. AI-powered insight

Nobody has time to manually check every user journey or replay to find issues or opportunities. Your analytics platform should do the heavy lifting, surface what matters, and, more importantly, tell you why it matters.

Tealeaf has limited intelligent analysis. You get Struggle Analytics to flag the top 10 struggling sessions and Anomaly Detection to track up to 20 pre-set metrics, but both rely on manual follow-up and narrow coverage.

Contentsquare uses AI to cut analysis time and accelerate decision-making. With our platform, you get:

• Alerts that instantly notify you when critical metrics change

• Frustration Score to pinpoint the top struggles causing customers to leave, ranked by business impact

• AI-powered Surveys that generate targeted questions, analyze sentiment, and link feedback to behavior

• Session Replay summaries that highlight key sessions and events

• Chat with Sense to ask plain-language questions like “Why are users bouncing from the checkout?”, with instant, contextual insights and recommended next steps

Sense analyzes multiple session recordings at once and highlights key events for you

7. Guesswork vs. revenue-backed prioritization

Tealeaf can show you how widespread an issue is, but not what it’s costing you. You’ll end up focusing on the loudest problems, not the ones with the biggest business impact.

Contentsquare calculates the revenue or conversion impact of any behavior, error, or element. Just use the Impact Quantification dashboard or click ‘quantify’ across the platform to understand what to focus on.

Use Contentsquare to focus on business-critical fixes, not vanity metrics

Pro and Enterprise customers also get Impact Evaluation, which lets you compare segments (like paid search vs. email) and measure missed conversions and potential upside. 

Use Impact Evaluation to quickly assess whether an issue is worth fixing, uncover performance gaps, and prioritize future investments based on ROI.

8. Confusing pricing vs. clear, flexible plans

Acoustic isn’t easy to evaluate. There’s no transparent pricing, no free plan, and no clear breakdown of what’s included unless you commit to a sales call. 

And since Acoustic isn’t really a unified platform, you’re left trying to price and package separate products like Tealeaf, Acoustic Campaign, and Acoustic Connect just to cover basic use cases. 

Contentsquare is built for every digital business, from fast-growing startups to the world’s biggest brands. 

Our free forever plan makes it easy to start, and our enterprise capabilities scale with you. That’s why we’re trusted by more than 30% of the Fortune Global 100 and +1.3 million websites and apps.

Want specific examples? Sure thing:

• How OLLY used Contentsquare to increase website revenue by +20%

• How Halfords used Contentsquare to increase NPS by 2.4 percentage points in 2 months

• How Motorpoint used Contentsquare to reduce reporting time by 75%

Contentsquare vs. Tealeaf Acoustic: which is right for you?

Tealeaf may have been impressive back in the early 2000s, but today it’s a legacy tool with slow setup, complex workflows, and limited adoption outside analyst teams. It can’t perform retroactive analysis, has minimal AI features, and makes it difficult to connect experience issues directly to business impact.

Tealeaf is probably only right for you if you have significant IT resources, a preference for on-premises deployment, or you are already invested in the Acoustic ecosystem.

Contentsquare is the better choice for almost every other team. Our all-in-one experience intelligence platform captures every interaction automatically, surfaces and prioritizes insights with AI, and connects everything back to business value. 

We’re freemium for smaller teams, scale seamlessly to enterprise, and are  trusted by +3,700 enterprise brands and +1.3 million websites and apps worldwide. But don’t just take our word for it: according to Forrester's Total Economic Impact study, companies using Contentsquare see a 602% ROI and recover $3.2 million in revenue by reducing friction in the customer journey.

Want to see how Contentsquare will turn your customers’ behavior into business growth? Take a product tour or request a demo today. 

FAQs about Contentsquare vs. Acoustic